
For most of semiconductor history, progress was a simple loop. Shrink transistors. Fit more into the same area. Get faster compute as a byproduct.
That loop had a name. Moore’s Law. It traces back to Intel co-founder Gordon Moore. He observed in the 1960s that the number of transistors on a chip, and hence its capabilities, tended to double every two years. The industry turned that observation into a roadmap. It was never guaranteed to run forever. Now shrinking is harder because we are starting to hit many limits in physics and economics, and the cost of pushing the frontier keeps rising.
So if the curve is going to keep bending upward, the industry needs new scaling vectors beyond making everything smaller in two dimensions.
This is why Two Small Fish invested in Zinite in 2021 at the company’s inception. The thesis was simple then, and it is still simple now. Scale in the third dimension, using proprietary technology protected by patents to enable true 3D chips.
Zinite stayed deliberately stealth early on, focused on building the core and protecting it properly before saying too much. Five years after we invested, we can finally talk about it more openly.
The company is led by its CEO, Dr. Gem Shoute. Fun fact. Her breakthrough was strong enough that her professors and industry veterans (who helped create fundamental IP used in all chips since 2008) joined her as co-founders, Dr. Doug Barlage and Dr. Ken Cadien.
The Distance Tax
In a recent blog post, I used a factory analogy to explain why speed, latency, and energy are often bottlenecked by movement, not necessarily arithmetic.
In short, systems don’t lose because they can’t do math. GPUs are already very good at that. Systems lose speed because they can’t feed the math with data fast enough.
In many systems, moving data costs far more than doing the arithmetic. When movement is expensive, speed and energy efficiency get worse together.
AI inference exacerbates the problem because the computational characteristics of AI inference workloads put a premium on memory behaviour. In many cases, the limiting factor is not arithmetic. It is how efficiently the system can move data. Bringing memory closer to logic matters because it directly reduces that movement.
Sensing fits in the same frame as logic and memory. Sensors generate raw data at high volume. If the system’s first step is to ship raw data far away before anything useful happens, it pays in bandwidth, latency, and power. The more intelligence that can happen closer to where data is produced, the less the system wastes just transporting information.
So the distance tax is one big problem showing up in three places at once. Logic. Memory. Sensing.
Why 3D Matters for Speed and Energy
When people hear 3D chips, they think density. More transistors per area. That matters. The bigger lever is proximity. Current 3D approaches to deliver more performance per area rely on advanced packaging, which is hindered by cost and the distance tax.
If memory can live closer to logic, the system avoids transfers that dominate both performance and power. If compute and memory can sit closer to sensing, the system avoids hauling raw streams around before doing anything intelligent.
Every avoided transfer is a double win. Speed improves because stalls go down and effective bandwidth goes up. Energy improves because fewer joules are burned moving bits instead of doing work.
That is the two birds, one stone result.
Five years after we invested, Zinite is far from just a concept. The company is doing exceptionally well, and it represents the kind of platform that can extend performance gains into the post-Moore era by reducing the distance tax, not by asking physics for more shrink, but by making data travel less.
Discover more from Allen's Thoughts...
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.